Let's call lies 'lies'

Seventy percent of Donald Trump’s public statements are false, according to PolitiFact. Some percentage of those are lies.

It’s time to call lies “lies”—especially when they’re told compulsively, unmistakably, and provably by public figures, including Trump, who takes office today.

The media has historically been slow to use hard words to report hard truths. The term “torture” was resisted by The New York Times longer than its executive editor said was necessary, in hindsight, and had instead been called “harsh or brutal interrogation methods.” We do ourselves and the public a disservice—factually, ethically, and reputationally—by not naming something what it is.

“Lie” has a specific definition that guides Fusion’s use of the word: To lie is to intentionally mislead people toward false belief.

This definition is consistent with top dictionaries, encyclopedias, and books on lying. Lies have to meet two conditions: the intention to deceive, and the knowing misrepresentation of fact.

All politicians bend the truth to some extent, but Trump boastfully breaks it, from his 9/11-chants lie, to his “birther” lie, to his Iraq war lie, to his illegal-voters lie, to his lie about not posing as his own invented publicist. These are lies, not merely misrepresentations. Trump knows he supported the Iraq war, or must know, because of his own public statements of support at the time. He knows President Obama was born here, and must have always known, because of the irrefutable evidence. Trump knows that “thousands and thousands” of Muslims did not “cheer” 9/11 from New Jersey, because it wasn’t ever reported—anywhere—and absolutely would have been.

Even if the public doesn’t expect Trump’s honesty anymore, or ever did, we should expect it from our president and public officials. By this definition, Trump has lied, does lie, is a liar, and, judging by his public record, is prone to continue lying. Through his teeth. Through his Twitter account.

This is why the media has to call lies “lies.” Careful reporters try to avoid presuming a person’s intention, choosing words like “misrepresentation” over “lie.” But the instinct to apply gradations of language where none fit can be dangerous. The false restraint shown by not naming “lies” has to be resisted, because the erosion of public trust in the media and government is caused by an avalanche of unnamed lies.

Only recently have many news outlets called Trump’s lies what they are, in both news and opinion pieces: