100 Days of the Messy Resistance
Trump’s first 100 days have been messy—and not just for the president, though a federal judge recently struck down yet another controversial executive order. For those of us opposed to the policies and agendas furthered by this administration, it’s been a long few months as shock turned to grief which turned, in many cases, to action. And while the idea of the first 100 days is an arbitrary metric in the first place, for as many columns on Trump’s campaign promises abandoned there have also been summaries of “the resistance,” as its “weaponizing data” or infiltrating Harvard or shouting punchy slogans on tax day.
But for all the optimism that comes with projecting a unified “resistance,” the first 100 days of living in Trump’s America has forced complicated, divisive conversations among people whose goals, if not experiences, are aligned. Here are some of those diverse tactics that mattered.
The Women’s March, The Women’s Strike, and the People Who Opposed Them
Essentially from the moment it was announced, the post-inaugural Women’s March on Washington was mired in controversy: Its name was changed to less directly recall a ‘90s movement for black self-determination, its organizers were berated and shuffled around, its collective vision was slammed when it (briefly) partnered with a pro-life group and (permanently) removed language about sex workers from its states goals.
And while the march itself was massive, drawing three times as many people as the Trump Inauguration itself, questions about the legitimacy and self-awareness of such a broad movement remained, as was in evidence with a much-circulated photo of Angela Peoples holding a sign reading “White Women Voted for Trump” in front of pink hat-clad women taking selfies.
In the months following, the Women’s Strike would ignite an adjacent conversation over whether striking was an act of privilege or solidarity.
The People Running for Office
Muslims and scientists and female immigrants and “millennials” are running for office in unprecedented numbers in an attempt to counteract an administration that has skewed whiter and more male than many in recent history. Earlier this month, in a surprise near-victory, the filmmaker Jon Ossoff almost outright captured a seat in Georgia’s House (there will be a runoff in June). It’s been a reminder to conservatives of just how endangered they are, even in states that were previous strongholds. But while Ossoff is a young and politically inexperienced candidate, his rise to prominence wasn’t exactly radical: The candidate’s platforms skew towards the pragmatic center and his campaign was bolstered by significant establishment funding.
The Activist Lawyers