Mars is not just a red planet


If there’s one thing about space that anyone is likely to know, it is that Mars is red. Redness, in fact, is the defining quality of the fourth planet from the sun. Glimpsed from afar, through the telescopes of the 19th century or the Hubble Space Telescope, Mars looks red.

But what about on the ground? If you, a human, were to stand on Mars and kick a toe into the soil, what would the dust around your ankles look like?

Today, Emily Lakdawalla of the Planetary Society posted the images below, as processed by space enthusiast Gerald Eichstädt. They show different leftovers from various drilling projects that the Curiosity rover has executed on Mars since it dropped onto the planet three years ago. The tailings from the rock just underneath the surface are a different color from the overlying red dust. Just below the surface, Mars is hardly red at all.

The top line of images show the raw images direct from the Rover, without any processing. The bottom line of images have had their saturating increased, so that the subtle color variations are more noticeable. In either case, what’s immediately clear is that Mars is not just a red planet. Mars is not really red at all in many spots. At the most extreme end, you might call it ruddy.

The color differences are explained by the varying chemical composition of the rocks that compose the Martian surface. They also show just how much we have to learn about what lies beneath the surface of Mars. It’s not just about finding water or life, but about understanding the fundamental properties of this planet that humans have been wondering about for hundreds of years.

Humans, and even superhumans like Elon Musk, are still years away from visiting the planet, but there’s something wonderful about our little rover doing mundane scientific work on the surface of another planet, drilling away, showing us what lies under the red cover.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share Tweet Submit Pin