After Charlottesville, More Counterprotesters Are Being Arrested Than White Supremacists
The “Unite the Right” rally on August 12 left one dead, 19 injured, and the city of Charlottesville in a state of turmoil and fear. In its aftermath, local leaders hurriedly vowed that justice would be served and order and safety restored. Most assumed this meant that the white supremacists who committed violent assaults on people of color, including the five men who violently beat a black man in a parking garage, would be punished. But instead, many of the people being arrested, including 10 new suspects the Charlottesville Police Department just announced they are seeking, are counter-protesters—and many of their arrests are happening solely on the basis of accusations being brought by white supremacists.
Activists and anti-white supremacist protesters began getting arrested long before August 12, in a series of moves that many found to be political. Jason Kessler, one of the organizers of the Unite the Right rally, lives in Charlottesville, and anti-racist activists had long been using nonviolent techniques to make it clear he was not welcome in town. On May 20 and June 2, Kessler got into yelling matches with Veronica Fitzhugh, a local activist, and Jeff Fogel, a prominent local defense attorney. Both times, based solely on the word of Kessler, the CPD arrested both Fitzhugh and Fogel on charges of disorderly conduct and assault, respectively.
To understand how this is possible, one has to know that Virginia is one of a handful of states that will grant a warrant for someone’s arrest solely based on a complaint made by a private citizen. That means that any person, as long as they show up in person in front of a magistrate—who is not a lawyer or a judge—can allege that they were the victim of a crime and the magistrate will issue an arrest warrant without the police having investigated the facts.
The magistrate also uses his or her discretion as to how the accused will be brought into custody. They can either issue a simple summons based on the victim’s complaint, meaning the accused must appear in court on their own volition, or a warrant for arrest, meaning handcuffs, mugshots, and booking.
Predictably, these “citizen-initiated” warrant statute doesn’t benefit everyone equally. Though a local antifa activist also used used it to seek consequences when Kessler doxxed her online, many local people of color and activists are hesitant to trust local law enforcement. Besides, many of the white supremacists who committed crimes in Charlottesville live in other states. So this statute has mostly been used against counter-protesters.
In North Carolina, the only other state that allows this statute to be interpreted as broadly as Virginia does, thousands of citizens signed several petitions started by victims urging the state to reconsider the statute or clarify that the complaint must have factual merit for a magistrate to grant the arrest warrant. “I work in law enforcement and see how unfair this system can be,” wrote Elizabeth Kistler, a deputy sheriff in Hanover County, on one such petition. “It is basically a grudge match where whoever makes it to a magistrate first, wins.” Even if the charges are eventually dismissed, citizens still suffer emotional, physical, and social damages.
Just this week, Fitzhugh and Fogel were found not guilty and cleared of all charges, and Fogel also filed complaints against the magistrate who issued his arrest warrant as well as the two police officers who carried it out, alleging that the circumstances of his arrest were unlawfully harsh and public. But the damage had been done. Fitzhugh and Fogel were both arrested at their homes, and their mugshots appeared online and in several local papers. Fogel was running at the time for the position of Commonwealth’s Attorney on a platform of radical racial justice reform, and his reputation in the campaign was damaged.