Another restriction that was blocked reportedly would require a woman to contact a third party, such as a sexual partner or her parents, before determining how fetal tissue from an abortion would be disposed of. The state has claimed this argument is inaccurate.
But Judge Kristine Baker said the threat to women’s health from the restrictions is far greater than any potential damage to the state an injunction would cause. She added that the tissue disposal requirements would delay care and discourage doctors from providing abortions.
Three of the restrictions were set to take effect next week, while a fourth would have been implemented in January.
“For these reasons, the Court is not convinced that importing the [disposal law’s] complex requirements for authorization advances a public health goal,” Baker wrote, according to the AP. “These requirements also do not advance interests in women’s health because delay and other negative effects instead threaten women’s health and wellbeing.”
Another restriction that was temporarily blocked would ban abortions that are based on a fetus’ sex. A fourth provision would have required doctors to take certain steps such as preserving embryonic tissue or notifying police for abortions performed on women under 17. That rule currently applies to people under 14.
Earlier this month, the ACLU had argued before Judge Baker that the provisions are unconstitutional.
The report notes that bans on dilation and evacuation already are in place in Mississippi and West Virginia, and are set to take effect in Texas later this year. Similar bans in other states have been blocked by court challenges, according to the AP.
GET SPLINTER RIGHT IN YOUR INBOX
The Truth Hurts