I Worked at Us Weekly During the Election. I'm Sorry About President Trump.
I have always had a love-hate relationship with reality TV. When it first rose to prominence in the early 2000s, I abstained. To me, TV-watching was escapism; entertainment was a realm of suspended disbelief and aspirational living. Did I really want to watch normal people bungle about on the small screen, only to be reminded of my own mediocrity and insecurities?
But over time, reality TV evolved. The more candid, untrained contestants of MTV’s The Real World gave way to the glossy cast of Laguna Beach: The Real Orange County. Sound bites and in-jokes made the supposedly authentic cast feel less “real” somehow. These were normal people, but with great hair and makeup that made them more like characters than individuals. The launch and success of other shows—America’s Next Top Model, Survivor, Keeping Up With the Kardashians—made reality TV less and less of a guilty pleasure. I began to watch, faux-reluctantly, from the sidelines.
Then I became an intern at People in 2009, where I began to understand exactly how a celebrity is made. So much of what I had attributed to happenstance—the rise of a baby-faced YouTube star named Justin Bieber, the entertainment empire of a family named Kardashian—was not happenstance at all, but the result of a lot of people working hard to create the illusion of an organic rise.
Publicists meticulously planned their clients’ appearances at charity events to coincide with an album release or a forthcoming film. I remember interviewing up-and-coming starlets at store openings in Soho, only to see their faces plastered across magazines and billboards shortly afterward. I shook hands with burgeoning CW stars at office meet-and-greets, and then watched them catapult into stardom with hit TV shows, fragrance ads, and action flicks within the next few months.
This was a time before Twitter had really become the marketing tool it is now, before Instagram and Snapchat even existed, allowing celebrities to interact directly with their fans. Back then, reputations lived and died based on the decisions of celebrity websites and magazines.
My job, as a staff editor at Us Weekly, was to track Trump’s every tweet, speech, flub, and tirade.
In late 2010, I moved over to the New York Daily News, where I became the default TV recapper of all those reality shows I had felt so ambivalent about: The Bachelor/ette, Survivor, Dancing With the Stars…and Celebrity Apprentice. “Don’t worry about the ousted model,” I wrote of season 11 contestant Hope Dworaczyk, the target of Trump’s many sexist remarks in the boardroom. “Hope’s parting words are representative of her vapid approach…‘It was cool to be fired by Trump!’”
Five years later, I would become a writer at Us Weekly, tasked with monitoring Trump’s every move, a duty that would cost me my conscience and, eventually, my job. But in retrospect, the recaps were where my complicity began. By recapping Celebrity Apprentice, I was giving rise to Donald Trump, the reality TV star. Donald Trump, the shiny beacon of success. Donald Trump, the bombastic blowhard who would go on to become president of the United States of America.
This time last year, the fact that Trump fancied himself president material still felt like a joke. He was knee-deep in the trenches, fighting for the Republican party nomination. And my job, as a staff editor at Us Weekly, was to track every tweet, speech, flub, and tirade.
I was detailing every rally. Every Twitter feud. Every unlikely, unforgivable comment he made on every television appearance in his months-long campaign for the presidency. My headlines were alternately flip and sensational. A sample: “Donald Trump Lurks Behind Hillary Clinton During 2016 Debate, Sparks Viral Meme.” My opening line: “Hark! Who goes there?” The post was easily one of our most liked, tweeted, and shared that day.