J.D. Vance and the MAGA Foreign Policy
Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images
In February 2017, then-Vice President Mike Pence went to Europe to reassure leaders that President Donald Trump was committed to the continent’s security, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). He mostly said the right things, but Europeans still had a sense of unease. After all, how much power does a vice president really have?
If Trump wins this time, Europe might not even get a nice speech. Trump’s vice presidential pick in J.D. Vance reveals that the MAGA takeover of the GOP’s foreign policy is basically complete.
Vance, a freshman senator from Ohio and the author of that book everyone was reading in 2016 to pretend to understand Trump voters, doesn’t have a ton of foreign policy experience. Yet he’s molded himself in the Trumpian image, and then some: an America First, anti-China, over-Europe kind of guy. He has opposed aid to Ukraine, suggesting it’s not in U.S. interests to keep funding the war, and that Washington’s focus is detracting from deterring China from invading Taiwan. He’s protectionist on trade, and skeptical of US interventionism. He has criticized America’s liberal economic policies and the commitment to the “rules-based international order” as an enrichment project for elites.
Trump metastasized this strain in the Republican Party. Vance, after his own, er, conversion, now epitomizes it, even hardens it, adding a kind of coherence to the Trumpian worldview. Veeps may not have a lot of foreign policy influence, save for a portfolio item or two. But Vance’s appointment is a clear signal of the party’s future.
“The symbolism still matters, because I think [Trump’s] definitely picking someone who is in his mold. And I think he’s sending a clear message to the GOP about where he wants the party to move,” said Garret Martin, Senior Professorial Lecturer Foreign Policy & Global Security at American University.
“He’s sending a signal that he wants the party to move more in a MAGA line in foreign policy,” Martin added, of Trump.
That reality has heightened nerves among America’s allies and partners, particularly those in Europe and Ukraine. Even partners in Asia are a little wary, given the possibility of a more unreliable Washington and its transactional foreign policy. Still, that means Trump likely sees more of a utility in maintaining partnerships in Asia, whereas both he, and his running mate, have been pretty clear (if not totally accurate) that they see Europe as a bunch of freeloaders. As Vance said earlier this year, the U.S. has “provided a blanket of security to Europe for far too long.”
Which is why European leaders were already deeply worried about what Trump’s return might mean for NATO and its security. Vance’s appointment amplified that sense of unease and urgency. “More champagne popping in the Kremlin. JD Vance nominated to prop up his “America’s Hitler,” wrote Guy Verhofstadt, a pro-Europe member of the European Parliament who’s been critical of the EU for not doing enough to prepare for Trump’s return. “Are Europe & the UK preparing yet or still shuffling the deck chairs on the titanic?”
Vance, in particular, has been outspoken over the two things Europe is probably most worried about, trade and Ukraine aid. On trade, Vance is as much a tariff acolyte as Trump, if not more so. On Ukraine, as Vance said in February 2022: “I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine.” He has also said that it’s worth dealing with Vladimir Putin, including making concessions on Ukrainian territory. Mostly, he believes that the U.S. aid to Ukraine comes at the expense of Taiwan and efforts to counter China, even though a big share of the Ukraine funding is building up the U.S. defense capacity, and Vance has continued to back U.S. support elsewhere, including to Israel.