What The Heck Is Going on at United States Air Force Plant 42?
Photo by U.S. Air Force
Back in August, I wrote a deep dive into Chuck Schumer’s UAP legislation that contains the phrase “non-human intelligence” 22 times, among other shocking sentences in an official bill submitted to Congress that Schumer, Sen. Mike Rounds and others are still fighting to pass to this day. In between the two parts I published, a member of the government who I confirmed has worked on UAP investigations reached out to me. They did not provide me with any reportable or particularly detailed info, we just spoke on background, but they did point me in a couple directions of where to dig, stressing that United States Air Force Plant 42 (USAF Plant 42) was one key place to look into. They did not say what the nature of what I should look into was or anything specific about USAF Plant 42, just that it was the direction my investigations should take me.
I have spent the months since digging into it and finding little information I can piece together into a report with any kind of conclusion to it, and I still do not quite know what direction I was pointed in. But there is more than enough weirdness at the base of USAF Plant 42 to write a piece summarizing what we do know, and there is very clearly a mystery ongoing here that is not just limited to USAF Plant 42. If you have information about USAF Plant 42 or on any of these drone incursions into our military bases, please reach out to me at Jacob at Splinter dot com so we can coordinate a secure way to communicate. You can remain anonymous and only speak on background if you would like.
USAF Plant 42 is located in Palmdale, California. In 1935, the Bureau of Air Commerce built a small airstrip in the desert which could be used by pilots in distress to land on instead of a public road. During World War II, Palmdale Army Airfield was established at the same location, largely functioning as an emergency landing field for the B-25 Mitchell medium bomber. In 1946, it was designated as a surplus facility by the federal government and Los Angeles County purchased it to use as a municipal airport, which is still in use today.
In 1950, the Air Force reactivated the property to use in the assembly and testing of aircraft for the Korean War. They subsequently purchased the land back from Los Angeles County in 1951, and began handing out contracts to goliaths like Lockheed Martin. The famed Skunk Works division of Lockheed that builds our most exotic aircraft relocated to Plant 42 and in 1968, built the hangar it currently maintains. Today, USAF Plant 42 is home to some of the world’s most highly advanced aircraft and their parts built by the United States and our largest defense contractors.
The ownership structure for the base is a Government Owned, Contractor Operated entity (GOCO). The nature of these entities is a bit strange in that they are facilities that the government owns, but the government pays private contractors to operate them. The government owns 85 percent of the 6,600 acres of land that USAF Plant 42 sits on, but just 45 percent of the 4.2 million square feet of floor space. While the structure of GOCOs is such that ultimately, the federal government owns them, the nature of their ownership structure leads a lot to interpret. As Dwight Eisenhower warned us in his farewell address, the line between military contractors and the government is blurring more every day, and if you were to walk on to USAF Plant 42 and demand to speak to the person in charge of everything going on at the sprawling facility, I’m not sure they would be able to produce that for you even if they wanted to (which I can confirm they absolutely do not want to talk about ownership of anything on the base).
But the ownership structure of USAF Plant 42 is far from its most confounding mystery. Occam’s Razor is it’s like all the other GOCOs, but there is a big difference between USAF Plant 42 and say, Sandia National Labs which also is run by GOCO ownership. For one, Sandia National Labs has not been hit with unknown “drone” incursions like USAF Plant 42 has. There are other GOCOs, like Plant 4 in Texas that also manufactures cutting-edge aircraft like the F-35, and there were unknown drone incursions at military facilities in Fort Worth just a ten-minute drive away from it in December. This ocurred during the New Jersey drone hysteria that surely had a very conventional explanation for most of what people saw, but the Department of Defense did confirm afterwards that “there have been a limited number of visual sightings of drones over military facilities in New Jersey and elsewhere, including within restricted air space.”
At the same time my source told me to look at USAF Plant 42, The War Zone reported that it “has seen a wave of mysterious drone incursions in recent months. The incidents have now become serious enough to prompt the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to impose new, if temporary flight restrictions around the sprawling high-security facility.”
Last month, Christopher Sharp of the Liberation Times obtained Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) records of these drone breaches at USAF Plant 42, writing that “the documentation shows official USAF reports describing rotary-wing drones with blinking lights and camera systems repeatedly hovering over sensitive areas, prompting patrol responses, off-base pursuit attempts, and coordination with the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), with assessments suggesting the drones operated beyond typical hobbyist capabilities.” These FOIA records also revealed that the Commander Reports for USAF Plant 42 state that the “Unmanned X Systems” they called these drones have “appeared to have coordinated arrival, departure and flight paths and times.” One incursion describes a drone hovering motionless for 25 minutes over Site 7 at USAF Plant 42, and another details an off-base pursuit of two drones that yielded no known information about them to Plant 42’s operators.
Does this sound like the kind of investigative results the most powerful military in the history of mankind should be producing? I certainly don’t think so.