Which presidential candidate is best for dads?
Few social policies seem to do as much universal good as paid paternity leave: Study after study has shown that when a father plays an active role in a child’s early years, he or she will end up healthier, achieve greater academic success, and even make more money. Everybody wins.
Unfortunately, our country’s paid family leave policies do little to support dads. In fact, just yesterday, the Council on Contemporary Families released a report revealing that, compared to parents in other Western countries, American parents are miserable. The reason, they determined? That’s right—poor social support.
So in honor of Father’s Day, we thought we’d explore the question—which presidential candidate is best for dads, when it comes to promising generous paternity leave policies? Which candidate could help boost the happiness levels of the millions of hardworking men out there?
I’ll let you take a guess.
While only one remaining frontrunner is a dad himself—Republican nominee Donald Trump—the former reality TV star has expressed reluctance to expand the length of guaranteed paternity leave. When asked about the issue in a recent Fox News interview, Trump could only reply, “You have to keep our country competitive, so you have to be careful of it.”
While, to be sure, Trump’s stance reflects that of many Republicans, given all of the research showing the benefits of paid parental leave, the candidate might not realize that this reluctance isn’t setting the country up to be competitive at all. Trump may be all about being a “winner” and being “strong” and, of course, making America “Great Again,” but his stance on paid leave might very well result in families emerging as the losers he so despises.
By contrast, presumptive Democratic nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has made paid leave an essential part of her platform, campaigning on a guarantee of 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave for workers, regardless of gender. Clinton’s proposal would allow for workers to earn a minimum of two-thirds their regular salary while exercising this leave, allowing them to continue financially supporting their families. Her plan is to fund this initiative through taxes on the country’s highest-earning taxpayers.
A recent policy brief issued by the Department of Labor showed that while 9 out of 10 fathers in the U.S. take some time off of work for the birth or adoption of a child, 70% of these fathers are allotted ten days or less. A staggering 88% of workers have no access to paid leave at all, and those fathers who do are typically offered less time off for paternity leave than women are for maternity leave. This creates a situation that unjustly penalizes both two-dad families and any family in which a father wishes to have an active role in his child’s life. Only three states—California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island—provide paid family leave to both mothers and fathers on an equal basis.
Meanwhile, the Department of Labor notes that families with fathers who take more leave also share chores and childcare more equally between mothers and fathers. So paid leave and equitable paternity leave policies not only give dads the time to be parents, but cause a trickle down effect of creating greater gender equity. Which is why Republicans’ reluctance to jump on the paid leave boat is pretty shocking.