Will Ayotzinapa protests spark revolutionary change in Mexico?
Mexico is no stranger to massacres.
In 2010, The Zetas drug cartel slay 72 people and dumped their bodies in a ranch warehouse in the northern state of Tamaulipas. A year later, the same drug gang entered a casino in the northern city of Monterrey and murdered 52 people according to official estimates before setting fire to the building.
Both incidents made horrible headline news. But neither mobilized Mexican society the same way that the recent disappearance of the 43 Ayotzinapa college students has.
On Thursday, tens of thousands of citizens marched against the government in various parts of the country. In Mexico City one group of protesters squared off with police in front of the airport, while another crowd filled the city center and burned President Enrique Peña Nieto in effigy.
But is Mexico really “on the brink,” as a headline on the Guardian recently posited, or will this episode also fade into the foggy memory of past atrocities?
Mexican historian Enrique Krauze says change must come from the government and society. “The protests are a wave of indignation that is perfectly justified, people are fed-up and completely disappointed with the poor performance of the government,” he said. But he doesn’t think the current wave of protests have a clear call to action, and as a result “prevail more on social media than on the streets.”
“It is relatively easy to protest but much harder to build something,” he says.
Javier Osorio, a professor at the John Jay School of Criminal Justice, believes the tragedy will trigger “cosmetic” changes rather than profound reform. He notes that Mexico has gone through moments of great political turmoil in the recent past, including the collapse of the voting system on election night in 1988, the assassination of a leading presidential candidate in 1994, and the Zapatista uprising that same year. Osorio says those events generated real change, but doubts the Ayotzinapa protest movement is anywhere near the same scale of history-shapers.
“I don’t think this is going to generate reforms to the Constitution or further the opening of democracy,” he said.