For America and Israel, How Many Innocent People Killed Is Too Many?
Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images
War is hell, some people are fond of saying. Those still in constant struggle over the obvious facts in front of their noses downplay every Israeli attack, every atrocity, every mass murder as just another brutal fact of war, which they seem to forget still has rules (theoretically), of which the President of the United Staes has said they likely violated, which means the Biden administration likely violated both international and U.S. law too. We see this dynamic again and again and again from Western commentators still shamelessly dedicated to the imperial cause of the 20th century, as every carpet bombing of a neighborhood by Israel can be portrayed as a “win” if there is a bad guy in the rubble amongst the children.
Israel killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and others in his leadership over the weekend in a massive strike in Lebanon. Western commentators and papers like The Washington Post celebrated the killing of one man, even as Al Jazeera notes, “Israel dropped what local media said were ‘bunker-busting’ bombs and flattened about six buildings.” How many other people were killed in the strike is still to be determined as rescue teams continue to sift through the rubble, but with six buildings in a dense city being “flattened,” the death toll is likely to be high.
The Washington Post reported that these were likely U.S.-made 2,000-pound bombs, as yet again our signature is found next to Israel’s bloody fingerprint. The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board called it a “justified defensive act” because of Hezbollah’s thousands of rocket and missile attacks into Israel’s north, one of which killed 12 civilians, including children. But as Roqayah Chamseddine noted for Splinter in her report at the funeral Israel attacked in Beirut, Nasrallah said afterwards about Hezbollah’s continuing rocket attacks that “we tell Netanyahu and Gallant: the Lebanese front will not stop until the war on Gaza ends.”
Nasrallah echoed the WSJ Editorial Board’s stance that his attacks on civilians were defensive too, just in the name of Gaza. Who is and is not afforded the luxury of “defensive” attacks with civilian death tolls is determined entirely by one’s place in the international order, not the legality or legitimacy of what actually happened. This is proven by the Jordanian Foreign Minister repeating over the weekend what many Arab countries have offered through diplomatic channels: end the war in Gaza and Israel’s security will be guaranteed by its neighbors. Yet this basic fact has been ignored and obscured over and over again to justify mounting Israeli aggression in Gaza (a quick search of both their sites and Google does not seem to indicate that either The New York Times nor The Washington Post wrote about these comments from Jordan’s FM, but Haaretz did).